BLOG, or DIE. Author Bio
Saturday, 7 January 2012
Next Film Project:


PRESS RELEASE: Right Stripe Media LLC has recently purchased the rights to produce a documentary based on the Sunstone Press book “Blackwater Draw, Three Lives, Billy the Kid and the Murders that Started the Lincoln County War” by David S. Turk. Consulting in front of and behind the camera are noted law-enforcement historians David Turk and Steve Sederwall. In addition to being the author of “Blackwater Draw,” Turk is also the Historian for the U.S. Marshals Service and is no stranger to historical “cold cases.” Sederwall has been pursuing Billy the Kid cases for over a decade. As a law enforcement officer, he began his career as a Garland, Texas Police Officer and later served for the Los Angeles Police Department before his retirement as a Federal Criminal Investigator. Best known for their critically-acclaimed Civil War film “The Angel of Marye’s Heights,” Right Stripe Media’s focus is to bring unique stories to life in a manner that resonates with the audience. Historical themes and stories that examine the nature of man are of particular interest. Production is slated to begin in 2012 with multiple location shoots in New Mexico. For inquiries or additional information, contact Clint Ross and Michael Aubrecht at Right Stripe Media LLC at 703-760-6324, or email For a look at RSM’s debut film, or to purchase the DVD “The Angel of Marye’s Heights,” visit

Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 9:43 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, 12 January 2012 1:25 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 28 December 2011
Last post of 2011

As this month marks the 149th anniversary of the Battle of Fredericksburg, here is a video of my talk on the 123rd Pennsylvania Volunteers' experience in that engagement. This lecture was presented back in April for the 2011 Civil War Weekend at the Carnegie Library and Music Hall in Pittsburgh, PA. On a related note, I have just agreed to lead the 2012 Staff Ride at the Fredericksburg Battlefield for the senior staff here at the U.S. Marshals Service. More on that later.

Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 7:44 AM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 28 December 2011 7:47 AM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
Misquoting the Founders is a Political Epidemic

It’s no secret that the GOP has made a routine out of misquoting the Founding Fathers in support of their political agenda. According to The Washington Post: “Republicans have used incorrect quotes to portray the founders as sympathetic to modern conservatism. Knowing that people derive hope from the words of our founding fathers, Republicans frequently use and misuse their words to garner support for their positions.” Here are just a few of these counterfeit quotations:

“Thomas Jefferson wrote that government is best that governs least.” – Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)

“Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” – Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) claiming to quote George Washington

“As Jefferson said, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” – Congresswoman Virginia Foxx (R-NC)

“Our third president, Thomas Jefferson, said this, ‘Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.’” – Congressman Marlin Stutzman (R-IN)

“President George Washington said that the right to keep and bear arms is ‘the most effectual means of preserving peace.’” – Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT)

“The democracy will cease to exist, when you take away from those who are willing to work to give to those who would not.” – Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), claiming to be quoting Jefferson

None of these quotes were said by their attributers yet the Republicans continue to misquote them again and again. Personally, I don’t know what is more embarrassing for these folks, getting tangled in their own misquotes or regurgitating piss-poor research contributions from their staff. Either way, we are on to them. Edward Lengel, a UVA professor who edited George Washington’s personal papers spoke on the irony of this practice. According to him this is the exact type of political propaganda that would have infuriated the Founders: “It’s a betrayal of Washington’s legacy. It’s a betrayal of who he was. He would have been outraged to find people manipulating his words, or making things up, to indicate that he supposedly believed this or that thing.”

I will add that it is also a betrayal of the American voter.

Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 9:52 AM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 28 December 2011 7:39 AM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 23 December 2011
Washington's "Christmas Crossing" corrected

Tom Suozzi talks with artist Mort Kunstler in his studio about his version
of Washington Crossing the Delaware. (Photo: Newsday/Audrey C. Tiernan)

UPDATE: Here is a television segment featuring Mort’s painting on ABC World News.

After months of research, sketching and painting at the easel, our friend Mort Künstler has completed his version of George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River, a project intended to retain the drama of the iconic patriotic image painted in 1851 by Emanuel Leutze while correcting its myriad of mistakes. As one of his most challenging depictions, Mort himself has said that this will be the piece that he is remembered for.

Historians note Leutze's famous 1851 painting "Washington Crossing the Delaware," owned by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, contains numerous historical errors:

1. The original painting depicts the trip in daylight rather than at night, and in clear weather; the Dec. 1776, crossing took place in a nor'easter with heavy snow and sleet.

2. The Delaware River is not nearly as wide as depicted. At the crossing point, it's only 800 feet from Pennsylvania to New Jersey.

3. Leutze painted the river as being clogged with mini-icebergs rather than covered in broken-up sheet ice.

4. Standing in a small boat as the one depicted in a storm, Washington would have fallen overboard or capsized the craft. Longer Durham cargo vessels (one is shown in the background of the Künstler painting) carried soldiers while a flat-top ferry transported horses, cannons and probably Washington, historians say.

5. The most notable error is the inclusion of the American flag as the “Stars and Stripes” design was not adopted until 1777.

Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 8:30 AM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 28 December 2011 8:22 AM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
The Devout Beliefs of an Unbeliever: Thomas Paine’s Age of Reason

Often referred to as the “Father of the American Revolution,” Thomas Paine was also the best-selling author in eighteenth-century America. Even those with a casual knowledge of our nation’s history are familiar with his most popular work titled Common Sense. This was the radical political pamphlet that he anonymously published as “an Englishman” in January of 1776. Common Sense presented the American colonists with a bold argument for freedom from English rule at a time when the question of independence was still being debated. Upon its release, Common Sense quickly spread among the literate and within three months 100,000 copies were sold throughout the colonies.

Thomas Paine went on to write additional pamphlets, including a highly controversial deistic argument titled The Age of Reason; Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology. This publication levied harsh criticism on the institution of organized religion and challenged the very legitimacy of the Christian Bible. Published in three parts over a period of three years (1794, 1795, and 1807), it was also a bestseller that ignited a short-lived deistic revival.

Much like Thomas Jefferson, who wrote his own interpretation of scripture, Paine favored scientific reason over faith and rejected all biblical references to miracles. While promoting the concept of “natural religion,” he openly abandoned the notion that the Christian Bible was a divinely inspired book and argued against the very existence of a creator-God. By taking a philosophical stance that was usually reserved for the educated elite and by making it both irreverent and inexpensive, Paine was able to appeal to a mass readership, thus increasing sales while spreading his divisive message. Although it did not sell nearly as well as Common Sense, The Age of Reason went through seventeen editions and sold thousands of copies in the United States.

Not surprisingly, Paine’s irreverent assumptions on organized religion (Christianity in particular) were met with much anger and outrage, especially from the Church of England. The British government reacted to this by prosecuting any printer or bookseller that tried to produce and/or distribute the book. The content of The Age of Reason was divided into three sections: In Part I, Paine outlined his major arguments and personal creed. In Parts II and III, he analyzed specific portions of the Christian Bible in order to demonstrate that it was not the revealed “Word of God.” Throughout the book Paine placed an emphasis on the individual’s right of conscience and an inherent accountability to be held to oneself. At the beginning of Part I, he summarized his personal creed:

“I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

I believe in the equality of man; and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.

But, lest it should be supposed that I believe many other things in addition to these, I shall, in the progress of this work, declare the things I do not believe, and my reasons for not believing them.

I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.

All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.

I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.”

In his argument against the Bible, Paine not only questioned the sacredness of the text, but also its historical origins. He often referred to the stories as “fabulous mythology” and stated that the Book of Proverbs was “inferior in keenness to the proverbs of the Spaniards, and not more wise and economical than those of the American Franklin [referring to Benjamin].” Paine then went on to question the overall consistency and accuracy of the Bible, blaming the errors on man as opposed to a divine being. Many of his comparative-reasoning styles are still practiced today in biblical scholarship. According to Paine:

“Is it not a species of blasphemy to call the New Testament revealed religion, when we see in it such contradictions and absurdities?”

“It is not a God, just and good, but a devil, under the name of God, that the Bible describes.”

“That God cannot lie, is no advantage to your argument, because it is no proof that priests can not, or that the Bible does not.”

“There are matters in the Bible, said to be done by the express commandment of God, that are shocking to humanity and to every idea we have of moral justice.”

The Old Testament in particular became a major target for Paine’s criticisms. He argued that the God of the Old Testament was so tyrannical and cruel that he could only be a “human-authored-myth.” He then went on to present a series of incidents supporting this theory including an account from the Book of Numbers, specifically 31:13–47, in which Moses orders the slaughter of thousands of boys and women, as well as the abduction of virgins. Excerpt: “15 ‘Have you allowed all the women to live?’ he asked them. 16 ‘They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the LORD in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the LORD’s people. 17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.’” Paine called this kind of content a “book of lies, wickedness, and blasphemy; for what can be greater blasphemy than to ascribe the wickedness of man to the orders of the Almighty!”

Another sentiment offered by Paine was the distrust of religious institutions. This included the indicting of priests for their want of power and the Church’s opposition to scientific investigation. He recalled: “Soon after I had published the pamphlet ‘Common Sense,’ in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion. The adulterous connection of Church and State, wherever it has taken place has so effectually prohibited by pains and penalties every discussion upon established creeds, and upon first principles of religion, that until the system of government should be changed, those subjects could not be brought fairly and openly before the world; but that whenever this should be done, a revolution in the system of religion would follow.”

Isaac Cruikshank cartoon attacking Paine; The caption reads:
“The Age of Reason; or, the World turned Topsy-turvy exemplified in Paine's Works!”

Over the years many historians have supported the notion that Paine’s religious and political philosophies were very much in support of one another. Therefore Paine felt that propagating a religious revolution was crucial to the success of any political revolution, not only because the Church controlled the State, but also because it required a radically new way of thinking and looking at the world. The threat to achieving this “political enlightenment” was directly attributed to a religious superstition that prevented one from diversifying his or her antiquated perspective or rejecting what he or she had been taught. Scholars have referred to this theory as Paine’s “secular-millennialism.” Perhaps his most telling statement on the subject of reform (religious and otherwise) came at the conclusion of his Rights of Man when he stated: “From what we now see, nothing of reform in the political world ought to be held improbable. It is an age of revolutions, in which everything may be looked for.”

One might conclude that it was the climate in which it was conceived that made The Age of Reason such a condemning piece. Paine had originally penned and distributed the first part of the pamphlet while he was imprisoned in France for refusing to endorse the execution of King Louis XVI. Certain of his own impending execution, he remained sincere in the convictions he proclaimed. A fellow prisoner later bore testimony to his sincerity when he recalled that “Mr. Paine, while hourly expecting to die, read to me parts of the 'Age of Reason;' and every night when I left him, to be separately locked up, and expected not to see him alive in the morning, he always expressed his firm belief in the principles of that book, and begged I would tell the world such were his dying opinions. He was the most conscientious man I ever knew.”

Spared a trip to the guillotine, Paine was released in 1794 thanks to the efforts of the U.S. Minister to France, James Monroe who stated that “The citizens of the United States cannot look back upon the time of their own revolution without recollecting among the names of their most distinguished patriots, that of Thomas Paine.” He returned to America in 1802 only to discover that his contributions in the fight for independence were headed for obliteration due to his divisive religious views. Fortunately, this unpopularity with the church-going public was not shared by Paine’s political friends. John Adams stuck by his compatriot and proclaimed that “History is to ascribe the American Revolution to Thomas Paine.” Referring to Paine’s time in prison in his own native country, Lafayette declared that “A free America without Thomas Paine is unthinkable.”

His thoughts on the spiritual realm are still debated today. In 2006, English writer and atheist Christopher Hitchens wrote a book about the affect of Paine’s writings. In it he summarized the need for his words in today’s political spectrum. He wrote, “If the rights of man are to be upheld in a dark time, we shall require an age of reason. In a time when both rights and reason are under several kinds of open and covert attack, the life and writing of Thomas Paine will always be part of the arsenal on which we shall need to depend.”

In the final chapter of The Age of Reason, Paine sums up his entire belief on this world and the next. He writes:

“The book called the New Testament, which I hold to be fabulous and have shown to be false, gives an account in the 25th chapter of Matthew, of what is there called the last day, or the day of judgment. The whole world, according to that account, is divided into two parts, the righteous and the unrighteous, figuratively called the sheep and the goats. They are then to receive their sentence. To the one, figuratively called the sheep, it says, ‘Come ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.’ To the other, figuratively called the goats, it says, ‘Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.’

My own opinion is, that those whose lives have been spent in doing good, and endeavoring to make their fellow-mortals happy, for this is the only way in which we can serve God, will be happy hereafter: and that the very wicked will meet with some punishment. This is my opinion. It is consistent with my idea of God’s justice, and with the reason that God has given me.”



Davidson, Edward H. and William J. Scheick. Paine, Scripture, and Authority: The Age of Reason as Religious and Political Idea. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press, 1994


Kates, Gary, 1989, “From Liberalism to Radicalism: Tom Paine's Rights of Man”, Journal of the History of Ideas: 569–587.


Larkin, Edward, 2005. Thomas Paine and the Literature of Revolution. Cambridge University Press.


Hitchens, Christopher, 2006. Thomas Paine’s “Rights of Man”: A Biography.

Paine, Thomas. The Age of Reason, The Complete Edition World Union of Deists, 2009.


Paine, Thomas (Foner, Eric, editor), 1993. Writings. Library of America. Authoritative and scholarly edition containing Common Sense, the essays comprising the American Crisis series, Rights of Man, The Age of Reason, Agrarian Justice, and selected briefer writings, with authoritative texts and careful annotation.


Wheeler, Daniel, Life and Writings of Thomas Paine, Vincent & Parke, 1908. 

Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 8:54 AM EST
Updated: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 10:09 AM EST
Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older