BLOG, or DIE. Author Bio
Friday, 14 October 2011
More Constitutional Conventions?

Lawrence Lessig is a Harvard Law Professor and author of Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress--and a Plan to Stop It. In his book Lessig proposes several ways to fix a government that appears incapable of fixing itself. His methods are based on those of the Founders who established a system in which the people can institute change (if they are willing to make the effort required to do so). What makes this concept pertinent to my blog is the historical aspect of his plan which calls for individual states to hold their own constitutional conventions in an effort to discuss and propose amendments that will wrangle the electoral and ruling process.

According to Lessig “Article V of the Constitution gives the states the power to demand that Congress ‘call a Convention for proposing amendments’ to the Constitution. Such amendments are only valid when ratified by 3/4ths of the states. Never in the history of the Nation has an Article V convention been called -- though we came close a century ago, when the call for a convention to make the senate elected was within one vote of the necessary two thirds. That was enough to spur Congress to reform itself, by proposing its own amendment and ending the need for a convention.” Lessig recently appeared on The Rachel Maddow Show where he explained this concept of constitutional conventions and their potential affect for change. Watch Video

The original Constitutional Convention took place from May 14 to September 17, 1787 in Philadelphia, PA. The initial goal was to address a series of ongoing problems in governing the United States of America, which had been operating under the Articles of Confederation. Some attendees, including James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, looked at the convention as an opportunity to establish a new form of government instead of reforming the old one. Delegates elected George Washington to preside over the meetings, which ultimately resulted in the United States Constitution.

While at the convention Madison stated, “I consider the difference between a system founded on the legislatures only, and one founded on the people, to be the true difference between a league or treaty and a constitution.” The fact that these framers foresaw the potential for politics to become what it is today speaks volumes about their intuition and understanding of the nature of man. I think it’s fair to say that no single candidate or political party can solve the problems of an entire government. Simply relying on elections isn't the answer. Perhaps these conventions would enable the people to enact amendments that would take back control of a system that was supposed to work for them.


Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 8:20 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 14 October 2011 11:02 AM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older