« March 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31




You are not logged in. Log in
Pinstripe Press Blog: Author and Historian Michael Aubrecht
March 31, 2008
"Lost Causer"

Tonight I received an angry email from a rather disturbed reader, who took offense to my recent posting about the widening gap between academic and amateur historians. After calling me a bible-thumping hack (thank you by the way), he also accused me of being a “Lost Causer.” I have always been a little confused about people’s interpretations of that term so I did a quick Google search and came up with Wikipedia’s definition which is as follows:

The “Lost Cause” is the name commonly given to a literary and intellectual movement that sought to reconcile the traditional white society of the Southern United States to the defeat of the Confederate States of America in the Civil War of 1861–1865. Those who contributed to the movement tended to portray the Confederacy's cause as noble and most of the Confederacy's leaders as exemplars of old-fashioned chivalry, defeated by the Union armies not through superior military skill, but by overwhelming force, and tended to condemn Reconstruction. Some of the main tenets of the Lost Cause movement were that:

1. Confederate generals such as Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson represented the virtues of Southern nobility, as opposed to most Northern generals, who were characterized as possessing low moral standards, and who subjected the Southern civilian population to such indignities as Sherman's March to the Sea and Philip Sheridan's burning of the Shenandoah Valley in the Valley Campaigns of 1864.

2. Losses on the battlefield were inevitable due to Northern superiority in resources and manpower. Losses were also the result of betrayal and incompetence on the part of certain subordinates of General Lee. (The Lost Cause focused mainly on Lee and the eastern theater of operations.)

3. Defense of states' rights, rather than preservation of chattel slavery, was the primary cause that led eleven Southern states to secede from the Union, thus precipitating the war. Secession was a justifiable constitutional response to Northern cultural and economic aggressions against the Southern way of life.

After reading these qualifications I must say that I am apparently guilty as charged. BTW: None of these tenets are necessarily bad things and the majority of these beliefs albeit bias, are not that far off base. It also does not mean that one cannot have a strong affection for the Southern Confederacy’s perspective and still respect their northern counterparts. I do.

This reminds me that April is Confederate History Month. Don’t forget to acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of the boys in gray. They deserve to be remembered too. And to the gentleman that took the time to email me with his displeasure. Thank you Sir. I value your patronage of my blog and I hope that you will come again. I may be, as you say a Lost Causer, but I am also appreciative of your opinion and feedback.


Posted by ny5/pinstripepress at 11:05 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post

April 20, 2008 - 7:51 PM EDT

Name: "marc ferguson"
Home Page: http://basildorsey.blogspot.com/

Michael,

Do you really believe that Northern generals, in contrast to Southern generals, had low moral standards, that Lee only lost due to betrayel, and that the fundamental cause of the war wasn't conflict over slavery?

Marc 

April 20, 2008 - 11:25 PM EDT

Name: ny5/pinstripepress
Home Page: http://www.pinstripepress.net

Hello Marc, thanks for your comment on my Lost Cause post.

First and foremost, I do NOT believe in the entire definitions, but I do believe there is some merit to them as follows:

1. Yes, I believe that Confederate generals such as Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson represented the virtues of Southern nobility. I do not believe northern Gens. were polar opposites. I am a big fan of Oliver Howard.

2. Yes, I believe that many losses on the battlefield were inevitable due to Northern superiority in resources and manpower.

3. Yes, I do believe in the defense of states' rights first and foremost - even to this very day. I am a Libertarian after all.

However, the rest of the definitions are not (IMO) as accurate, but the overall concept of me favoring a cause over that of the United States Government is something I personally can sympathize with (once again even with today's administration).

View Latest Entries